People with sensory disabilities receive low academic and
behavioral expectations because they tend to keep to themselves and minimize
joining in social activities (Smith et al, 2008; Ting and Gilmore, 2012).
Stephens et al (2000) reviewed literature on attitudes
toward persons with deafness and hearing impairment and discussed that results
have little difference across various countries. They generalized that the
attitudes toward the deaf and hearing impaired are negative. Olika (2009) also
noted in her study that children with hearing impairment received more negative
than positive attitudes from hearing people. The informants also said that many
hearing people are rude, mean, screaming insulting words, isolating and
neglecting the hearing impaired child.
Walker (2008) also examined counselors-in-training’s
attitude toward persons who are blind or visually impaired and found that the
participants held rejecting or negative attitudes. Lecturers in South Africa
find teaching them a problem and consider these students a burden (Mushome and
Monobe, 2013). General education teachers identify them as the students they
least want to have in their classrooms (Horne, 1983 in Wall, 2002). In less
intimate situations (e.g. workplace), people are comfortable interacting with
them but not in helping situations or if close personal contact is required (Stovall
and Sedlavek, 2010). Among employers, persons with sensory disabilities
(together with cognitive and behavioral disabilities), were found to be the
most difficult to accommodate in the workplace as compared to medical,
neurological and physical disabilities (Center
for Information, Training & Evaluation Services, 2003).
On the other hand, Stanlland (2009) noted that nine out of
ten of the respondents in British Social Attitudes Survey in 2009 are fairly or
very comfortable interacting with persons with sensory impairments in various
situations (e.g as a boss, spouse, school/classmate, neighbor). The same survey
also found out that persons with sensory disabilities are less likely to
encounter prejudice from the public. Furthermore, teachers are positive in
including persons with sensory impairment (Mamah et al, 2011, Prakash, 2012).
They are more willing to accommodate these students than those with emotional
problems or with physical disabilities (Wolman et al, 2004, Stephens et al,
2000). Miller at al (2009) also found that students expressed the most
willingness to have relationships with persons with sensory disabilities as
compared to those with cognitive and psychiatric disabilities. Galloway (1972) also
found that counselors from four different populations have positive attitudes
towards the deaf.
Women generally are more comfortable than men in their
attitudes toward persons with sensory disabilities (Stanlland, 2009). Prakash
(2012) reported in his study that female teachers showed more positive attitudes
towards children with hearing impairment in their classroom when compared to
male teachers. On the other hand, Walker (2008) reported that gender was not
found to be significant in the attitudes toward persons with sensory
disabilities.
In relation to the current study in which age
is a variable, it is revealed that its impact on attitudes is not consistent
across scenarios particularly with persons with sensory disabilities
(Stanlland, 2009). For instance, the youngest age group reported the least
comfort interacting with people with sensory disabilities in workplace/boss
scenarios but not in marriage and school scenarios. No significant differences
in the attitudes of the participants were found when grouped according to age
(Walker, 2008). On the other hand, Stephens et al (2000) indicated that age was
significant as to whether persons with sensory disabilities make a lesser
contribution to the society. Older respondents were more likely than younger
respondents to indicate that persons with sensory disabilities make a lesser
contribution to the society.
Walker (2008) and Galloway (1972) found that no significant
difference between groups according to education (masteral or doctorate) among
counselors in their attitudes toward persons with sensory disabilities. These
however is inconsistent with Prakash (2012) who reported that teachers with
post graduate education held statistically more positive attitudes toward
persons with sensory disabilities compared to those who only have bachelor’s
degree.
In term of contact, Walker (2008) found no significant
associations between attitudes and contact toward persons with sensory
disability. However, if the participants were grouped according to their
experience with persons with sensory disabilities (none, casual, work-related,
intimate), a significant difference was found in the respondents attitudes.
Also, Wall (2002) reported that teachers with more direct or indirect exposure
and experience with persons with sensory disabilities hold more positive
attitudes than those with less experience.
image source: http://www.cbm.org/programmes/images/8856819_eb8a6b8555.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment